<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are all Baha&#8217;is!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bahairights.org/2008/09/17/we-are-all-bahais/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bahairights.org/2008/09/17/we-are-all-bahais/</link>
	<description>Defending the human rights of the Baha'i minority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.bahairights.org/2008/09/17/we-are-all-bahais/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bahairights.org/?p=225#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>I do not beleive that it is correct &quot; The Tudeh Party of Iran was one of the most prominent promoters of the above notion, though it was never able to produce a single document in support of its claim. However, the manufacturing of this undocumented theory prompted the silence – and at times the supportive silence of the intellectuals – over the suppression of the Bahais after the Islamic Revolution. The painful truth is that such a theory not only gained currency among the supporters of the [Tudeh] Party, but it also received widespread acceptance among the groups opposing the Tudeh.&quot;
As i know they never were against Bahi&#039;s , even they support the right of Religon. All of the long life of this party is devoted for struggling for the people rights , how come that they are against any specific religon . maybe this wrong vies is because of This Party&#039;s terms for its elements. according to their views the volunter for joining to that party should not be Bahi, because they belived taht Bahism is not a relegion but a political party , since nobody can participate in two political parties at the same time, they used to prevent the Bahais to join them. As i know many Bahiis left their organisatons of bahiis &amp; joined to that party. However if there is any document that proves this weblog claims on this party , it is appreciated to be shown to the publics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not beleive that it is correct &#8221; The Tudeh Party of Iran was one of the most prominent promoters of the above notion, though it was never able to produce a single document in support of its claim. However, the manufacturing of this undocumented theory prompted the silence – and at times the supportive silence of the intellectuals – over the suppression of the Bahais after the Islamic Revolution. The painful truth is that such a theory not only gained currency among the supporters of the [Tudeh] Party, but it also received widespread acceptance among the groups opposing the Tudeh.&#8221;<br />
As i know they never were against Bahi&#8217;s , even they support the right of Religon. All of the long life of this party is devoted for struggling for the people rights , how come that they are against any specific religon . maybe this wrong vies is because of This Party&#8217;s terms for its elements. according to their views the volunter for joining to that party should not be Bahi, because they belived taht Bahism is not a relegion but a political party , since nobody can participate in two political parties at the same time, they used to prevent the Bahais to join them. As i know many Bahiis left their organisatons of bahiis &amp; joined to that party. However if there is any document that proves this weblog claims on this party , it is appreciated to be shown to the publics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Franco Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.bahairights.org/2008/09/17/we-are-all-bahais/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Franco Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 02:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bahairights.org/?p=225#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Thank you for publishing this article. Your readers may also be interested in the following article in the Jewish Daily Forward, titled, &quot;We are All Bahais&quot;: http://www.forward.com/articles/13602/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for publishing this article. Your readers may also be interested in the following article in the Jewish Daily Forward, titled, &#8220;We are All Bahais&#8221;: <a href="http://www.forward.com/articles/13602/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forward.com/articles/13602/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

